Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rob (c137)'s avatar

When censorship is employed, they're desperate to keep the information away from people

Con-vid opened the doors for people to question vaccines which used to be automatic "yes-good for me".

The tide is turning, as with fluoride..

Expand full comment
Hanne Koplev's avatar

Thanks to Chris Exley for his great and brave work.

WHO writes:”The FDA analysis indicates that the body burden of aluminium following injections of aluminium-containing vaccines never exceeds safe US regulatory thresholds based on orally ingested aluminium even for low birth-weight infants."

https://www.who.int/groups/global-advisory-committee-on-vaccine-safety/topics/adjuvants

From this link: https://www.videncenterforallergi.dk/wp-content/uploads/files/ph.d-afhandlinger/PhD-Hoffmann.pd

"From these animal studies, a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of aluminum in humans has been defined by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): 1 mg Al/kg bw/week.... The overall bioavailability of ingested aluminum is low, with approximately….. 0.1% from food”

When WHO and other Health Authorities uses oral tolerable weekly of aluminum, for injected aluminium, they will have a calculation error with a factor 1000.

Ex. Gardasil 9 contains 0,5 mg Aluminium, which correspond to the exposure through food with 500 mg aluminium. This is at tolerable amount of aluminium for an individual by a weight at 500 kg (The weight of a riding horse) through one week! A girl at vaccination-age base ca. 40 kg.

If you do calculation for babies at vaccination, the exposure gets even more significant

Somebody needs to make WHO and other Health Authorities responsible for this severe error, so this error do not contribute to deposed aluminium in brain tissue.

Expand full comment
53 more comments...

No posts