A book published recently on vaccine safety is anonymous. Actually the book was first published several years ago in Israel in Hebrew, again anonymously. Earlier this year I was asked to review the English version. My brief review is copied below.
There is much to admire in the contents of this book. It brings together a wealth of information from disparate sources. I am not qualified to vouch for its accuracy but it is well written and balanced. Considering the breadth and depth of information offered I was surprised by some significant omissions. Most glaringly the work of Peter Aaby and Christine Stabell-Benn. I also found the book a little dated. Much has happened during the past few years in the field of vaccine safety. My own limited research in this field has caused me to question not simply the toxicity of vaccines, this is unequivocal, but their efficacy in addressing and preventing disease. I have called for a moratorium on the use of aluminium adjuvants in vaccines which in essence would prevent the continued use of about 80% of all vaccines. I foresee no danger to infant or adult health through the implementation of such a moratorium. Finally, the power of this book is greatly diminished by the author remaining anonymous. This is a worthy book but the opinions it expresses are not heretical. Stand up for your opinions and beliefs, as many of us have done in this subject. You will feel better for it.
I hope the above is useful. It is my honest opinion. Feel free to ignore it if you wish.
Best wishes
Chris
Many, including the ‘editors’ of the English version of the book, disagree with my assertion that the power of the book is greatly diminished by the author remaining anonymous. The usual arguments, all valid, supporting the need for anonymity are put forward. Perhaps I am simply bitter. After all, I lost my job and my career was brought to a premature end (hence writing this substack) because I continued to speak out and write about the dangers of aluminium to human health. Alternatively, perhaps I have a point. My legacy remains part of the public record and until refuted is the closest we have to the truth about aluminium, summarised in my recent book.
So, will this new book be a ‘game changer’ as suggested or will it simply fade into anonymity? With regret, I suggest the latter. If there ever was a time when anonymity is inappropriate, it is (borrowing from Vera Sharav) now.
I would have to agree, sadly, it is always just one or two people brave enough to speak out and then those few people get targeted and harassed. It would be much more difficult for them to silence people if there was multiple people standing up. And we are of course talking about harm to innocent children here. It is hard but we have to choose not to be part of it.
While I am here I will say I am forever grateful for your work. I have a diagnosis of ASD, I found your work around September 2020 and I have seen definite benefits from doing the silica waters protocol. I wouldn't have been able to achieve what I have achieved over the past nearly 2 years without your help. Thank you so much. How you have been treated is completely wrong.
Thank you for being brave enough to be publicly cancelled. I've noticed that most of the doctors speaking out publicly are either retired or have taken "alternative" career paths. The only good thing about the Great Reset is that many people have woken up about the (deliberate) dangers of vaccines.