28 Comments
Jan 10, 2023·edited Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

As a layman, I have nothing to add except my expressed appreciation for your clear thinking and explanation, and your decades of work. I first became aware of you through a recent Highwire interview. I am now in the last chapter of your exceptional book, Imagine You Are an Aluminum Atom, and I’m speechless. Somehow, a way needs to be found to get you funded and back in your lab. If I had such deep pockets, I would bankroll you in a heartbeat.

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Thank you, Dr. Exley for being a voice for continually speaking truth and exposing the corruption of the industry. I only hope an independent donor comes along that will fund your research again. It breaks my heart that you’ve been shut down, when humanity now needs you most.

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Thank you Dr. Exley. People such as yourself keep me, a non-academic, learning

Expand full comment

Science is now at a low point in history. It is controlled by money, the science says what you pay for. Science is literally a religion.

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Yes, big pharma no doubt will invent an autism drug and all based on fake research, such as this. There is no doubt that anyone who is vaccinated early in life will be subjected to a severe overload of AL. If AL was needed in the body, it would have been incorporated from the get go. I think there is absolutely no reason for any AL to ever be introduced into the body.

Big pharma demands it be injected early in life to help create more drug-needing patients later in life. And this method is through vaccines which have never been proven to be useful in assuring healthier humans. The doctors turn a blind eye and they call these people smart? What BS.

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

I agree, this is “ simply a patent looking for a home”. Ugh. I have a feeling this “new and innovative” test for autism might be part of other child-focused creepy research. Whitney Webb wrote an article about an infant brain mapping project that is busy gathering data to change our children…or worse, called “The Leap Towards Humanity’s Destruction”. She wrote, “The world’s richest medical research foundation, the Wellcome Trust, has teamed up with a pair of former DARPA directors who built Silicon Valley’s skunkworks to usher in an age of nightmarish surveillance, including for babies as young as three months old.” https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/06/investigative-reports/a-leap-toward-humanitys-destruction/ As I read that article I thought, “How on earth could they get any Mom or Dad to let their baby be mapped or changed by these monsters?” Well, if doctors tested newborns with one of these “new and innovative” tests, and they were told their kids could become autistic…they would probably try anything to stop that process. For the past couple years I have seen frightened parents hold their kids down in the isles of Costco to have a stranger shove a q-tip up their nose or inject them with a clot shot. It seams people like this “Tooth Man” are hard at work creating ways to use technology to convince parents that their children are not miracles made in the image of God, they are helpless and only technology can “fix them”. When we know poisons and toxins are what is damaging brains. I will be saying NO to any and all of it. Thank you Dr Exley for explaining this article to us. I will be passing your information onto everyone I know. God Bless, Jen

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Impenetrable algorithms and data without reference to appropriate blanks prevent any postulate being falsified - and so by definition are not science. Yes, it's all part of the New Age Pseudoscience that has become the dominant religion of the frauds and charlatans that now dominated 'debate' almost all sectors of what the politicians still really do believe to be 'The Science'. End of discussion!

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Thanks for keeping us informed and breaking this down. What’s worse... the faulty science they’re pushing, the media reporting on it and/or federal health agencies endorsing? Thanks for all you do to keep things true and transparent. You’re appreciated.

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Isn't hair analysis useless as it's the body's stored aluminum that is the problem; not the amount it is excreting in hair...?

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

I was delighted to see this in my mailbox. It is SO important that you keep pointing out the lies and negligence in today's "science." Thank you so much!

Expand full comment
Jan 16, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Thank you Dr. Exley! Straight to the point and understandable to "lay" people. I'll be posting this on Facebook and Twitter, The Highwire, Children's Health Defense, Steve Krisch and with James Lyons-Weiler. Thank you. You are a treasure to Health Freedom worldwide.

Expand full comment
Jan 12, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Hold their feet to the fire!

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Thank you Dr Exley for all you do. Thank you for explaining why this test is totally useless. I am sure that this research was bank rolled with some money making scheme in view.

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Most excellent review! Thank you!

Expand full comment
Jan 10, 2023Liked by Dr Christopher Exley

Though the data is lacking (or at least not sufficiently referenced) and the methodology is also not as good as it should be, does it automatically follow that the test itself might not provide a reliable result?

Even if both data and methods were sub-optimal, is it possible these tests nevertheless represent progress toward an important objective- to prove some meaningful measure on metals in children’s bodies?

Expand full comment

This type of critical analysis - of methods used in research - is important. To the 'layman parent' or others very focused on this topic - yet may not have the ability to dig into the methodology (s) used to confirm or deny an aluminum link - causal or otherwise -- your research becomes the primary voice on this topic! I cited you and your work on a related topic that I also wrote about - the health of our children - the need to look harder at the reasons why there has been a decline -- and the impacts on our future (for failing to dig deeper). Your work is a strong voice in this space - and again - this article helps! I am grateful for your continued work and that we can use it to help research other impacts - such as autism and national security and readiness in the future - as referenced here -- https://interdependencies.substack.com/p/a-foresight-scenario-what-does-the Thank you!

Expand full comment