After all that happened these past 2 years, I must admit I have finally come to the conclusion that aluminium (among other poisons) is being used intentionally to harm infants, causing neurological disorders and many other problems.
No other conclusion can be considered as rational.
The war on people we are facing started many years ago.
I share the opinion of Hypatie A in that there are people who are well aware of the truth and who conspire to hide it. May I note the contrast between the media furore that followed Wakefield's research, and the almost total blackout following yours, Dr Exley. They knew they could find substantial evidence against a clear MMR/autism connection, and thus they hid aluminum concerns via a 'bait and switch' tactic. I am not for an instant suggesting Wakefield had any bad intentions, but we all got played. Another point is that the lie is now so truly massive that it is unthinkable for scientists to challenge it. As a keyboard warrior on this may I share the question that the apologists find unanswerable. It is this: "A disturbing hypothesis is that aluminum adjuvants are strongly and causatively associated with autism. Do you consider that there is sufficient evidence to rule this out? If so, what is it?"
I mentioned Dr Exley's studies to a number of friends
2 are now drinking suitable water
My brother replied that a 5G mast has been place outside his house without request, and showed little interest
Others look at me blankly and show no interest
So maybe 1 in 5 at most see something important
Early in Covid, a pediatrician I know rejected the Vit D story as did a Professor (chemistry) - no point in making any comment re aluminium - some so-called professionals, with some authority, seem to have the least inquiring minds and are sadly part of the problem - they seem to succeed by remembering and repeating, and don't employ any critical thinking
What are your thoughts on this new Rutgers vaccine? Alhydrogel adjuvants and is it RBD's cultivated in yeast? Why does this make me very nervous??
"We show here that with a 2-dose prime-boost regimen in BALB/cJ mice, the resultant vaccine, MT-001, exhibited peak anti-spike IgG ELISA titers comparable to those reported in studies with mRNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) at similar doses in the same animal model [36,37]. When adjuvanted with both aluminum hydroxide (Alhydrogel) and the TLR-9 CpG agonist ODN1826, the MT-001 vaccine in BALB/cJ mice showed a balanced Th1/Th2 response as well as peak anti-spike RBD IgG midpoint ELISA titers on the order of 106 GMT. Syrian golden hamsters vaccinated with MT-001 adjuvanted with alum plus CpG exhibited undetectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 in lung tissue four days after intranasal challenge with SARS-CoV-2/US-WA1. We also observed that anti-spike IgG ELISA titers in sera from vaccinated mice were durable, with EC50s in the range of 105–106 up to 12 months post-vaccination. Furthermore, the results showed a meaningful breadth of the response, with significant neutralization titers against the Omicron BA.1 variant at this time point." https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/4/832
If you listen to my last interview with Del Bigtree you will hear that I warned that the next generation of (useless) covid jabs would include aluminium adjuvants. It is beyond me why scientists are developing new jabs for covid never mind with aluminium adjuvants. Sounds like what we used to call 'jobs for the boys'.
Quite right. They are only interested in the selling of, and not the proof in the pudding, of the product. Who would know if one vaccine contained more “cherries” or “apple” than another let’s say. Who would care of one persons constitution could not accept that extra “filling” or even the whole pudding, as long as it’s eaten and lots of boxes ticked and money made?
After all that happened these past 2 years, I must admit I have finally come to the conclusion that aluminium (among other poisons) is being used intentionally to harm infants, causing neurological disorders and many other problems.
No other conclusion can be considered as rational.
The war on people we are facing started many years ago.
After seeing the corrupt censoring of competing treatments for covid I have to agree.
I share the opinion of Hypatie A in that there are people who are well aware of the truth and who conspire to hide it. May I note the contrast between the media furore that followed Wakefield's research, and the almost total blackout following yours, Dr Exley. They knew they could find substantial evidence against a clear MMR/autism connection, and thus they hid aluminum concerns via a 'bait and switch' tactic. I am not for an instant suggesting Wakefield had any bad intentions, but we all got played. Another point is that the lie is now so truly massive that it is unthinkable for scientists to challenge it. As a keyboard warrior on this may I share the question that the apologists find unanswerable. It is this: "A disturbing hypothesis is that aluminum adjuvants are strongly and causatively associated with autism. Do you consider that there is sufficient evidence to rule this out? If so, what is it?"
Well said, Chris. Have you shared this with Del Bigtree yet?
I saw an episode where del discussed this
I mentioned Dr Exley's studies to a number of friends
2 are now drinking suitable water
My brother replied that a 5G mast has been place outside his house without request, and showed little interest
Others look at me blankly and show no interest
So maybe 1 in 5 at most see something important
Early in Covid, a pediatrician I know rejected the Vit D story as did a Professor (chemistry) - no point in making any comment re aluminium - some so-called professionals, with some authority, seem to have the least inquiring minds and are sadly part of the problem - they seem to succeed by remembering and repeating, and don't employ any critical thinking
The Governments Don't Give a Freaking Damn. It's just beyond Belief
What are your thoughts on this new Rutgers vaccine? Alhydrogel adjuvants and is it RBD's cultivated in yeast? Why does this make me very nervous??
"We show here that with a 2-dose prime-boost regimen in BALB/cJ mice, the resultant vaccine, MT-001, exhibited peak anti-spike IgG ELISA titers comparable to those reported in studies with mRNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) at similar doses in the same animal model [36,37]. When adjuvanted with both aluminum hydroxide (Alhydrogel) and the TLR-9 CpG agonist ODN1826, the MT-001 vaccine in BALB/cJ mice showed a balanced Th1/Th2 response as well as peak anti-spike RBD IgG midpoint ELISA titers on the order of 106 GMT. Syrian golden hamsters vaccinated with MT-001 adjuvanted with alum plus CpG exhibited undetectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 in lung tissue four days after intranasal challenge with SARS-CoV-2/US-WA1. We also observed that anti-spike IgG ELISA titers in sera from vaccinated mice were durable, with EC50s in the range of 105–106 up to 12 months post-vaccination. Furthermore, the results showed a meaningful breadth of the response, with significant neutralization titers against the Omicron BA.1 variant at this time point." https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/4/832
If you listen to my last interview with Del Bigtree you will hear that I warned that the next generation of (useless) covid jabs would include aluminium adjuvants. It is beyond me why scientists are developing new jabs for covid never mind with aluminium adjuvants. Sounds like what we used to call 'jobs for the boys'.
Quite right. They are only interested in the selling of, and not the proof in the pudding, of the product. Who would know if one vaccine contained more “cherries” or “apple” than another let’s say. Who would care of one persons constitution could not accept that extra “filling” or even the whole pudding, as long as it’s eaten and lots of boxes ticked and money made?