14 Comments

Is there any justification for injecting this crap into an infant during his first few days of life and then continuing for another decade?

Expand full comment

No justification at all. Infants are being murdered. If they survive some are brain damaged to live a difficult life of challenges like my son. Any child who has been injected, whether the damage is obvious or not, has been poisoned. Dr. Exley’s article on the vax program and aluminum is here: https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/vaccine-advice-to-parents

Expand full comment

Looking forward to part 3. As I read I'm wondering how to construct a Freedom of Information request to our Therapeutic Goods Regulator to find out on what studies they rely on to determine injecting Al adjuvanted vaccines ( or using it in the control groups for some clinical trials) is "safe". I'm fairly confident the studies were never done...just grandfatheres in alum.

Expand full comment
author

I think you will find that Del Bigtree and ICAN have done this.

Expand full comment

Of course...I had a quick look at ICANdecide.org and yes there is several FOIA responses

"NIH, does not have a single study involving the injection of this substance [Aluminium] that would support its safety."

https://icandecide.org/article/nih-concedes-it-has-no-studies-assessing-the-safety-of-injecting-aluminum-adjuvants/

ICAN petitions the FDA referencing your work

https://icandecide.org/press-release/petition-filed-regarding-improper-amounts-of-aluminum-adjuvant-in-childhood-vaccines/

And Nov 2021 follow up with the FDA

https://icandecide.org/press-release/fda-still-cannot-confirm-level-of-aluminum-adjuvant-in-vaccines-injected-into-babies/

And March 2023

"CDC and NIH... do not have a single study to support the safety of recommending repeated injection of this cyto- and-neuro toxic substance as part of the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule."

https://icandecide.org/press-release/cdc-and-nih-unable-to-provide-a-single-study-to-support-the-safety-of-injecting-aluminum-adjuvants-despite-its-widespread-use-in-childhood-vaccines/

Expand full comment

Bloody laws of thermodynamics!!! :-D

Expand full comment

I've personally had side effects from 'flu vaccines' that I assume we're aluminium related, so I realise injection is the most dangerous delivery method. I was wondering however, about ingesting it via food and drink. Does it leach out of aluminium wrappers and foil for example, and if so, does it get into tissues in any significant quantities?

Expand full comment
author

In short, yes but may I recommend that you read my book for all the reasons why. You will also find this sort of information in the posts in this substack.

Expand full comment
Jul 2·edited Jul 2

Yes! From a comment in November 2023:

Toxic levels of aluminium was discovered in fish and beef after baking them wrapped in aluminium foil:

"Quantification of the Aluminum Content Leached into Foods Baked Using Aluminum Foil"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696975/

"In conclusion, on the basis of the results obtained from this study, is recommended that the use of Al foil for baking food should be avoided in order not to exceed the TWI suggested for Al by health authorities such as the Italian Ministry of Health."

I wonder if liver pâté baked in aluminum forms has ever been tested? It is quite fatty, it contains many condiments, as well as salt, and it is baked at fairly high temperature for a long time. Might not these factors accelerate the leaching of toxic level of aluminum into the liver pâté?

>> REPLY from Dr Christopher Exley

>> Nov 20, 2023

>> Factors increasing the bioavailability of aluminium from (and into) food include low and high pH, presence of organic acids and in relation to the latter, fat as small organic complexes of aluminium if neutral in charge can dissolve quite easily into fat, including the fats that make up biological membranes.

From https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/food-glorious-food/comment/43985467

Expand full comment

“One simple example of this can be found when aluminium salts are dissolved in an experimental animal’s drinking water which the animal then proceeds to imbibe over hours, days, or even weeks in some instances. The biological availability of the aluminium being ingested from water which is 1 week old will be significantly different to the same water when it was only hours old. The exposure regime has changed and concomitant differences in the biological response should be expected.“

Would it be correct to assume that the animal’s response to the aging solution is also dependent on the effect prior ingestion of the solution has had on the animal?

Expand full comment
author

Not sure what you are asking.

Expand full comment

Just that as the salts change with time, the body of the animal is changing with exposure and I’m wondering if that could affect how the animal’s body reacts to the aluminum. Weakening solution would seem to be less of a threat, but if the animal’s body is also weakening then the threat might remain the same?

Expand full comment
author

I think I sort of understand but if I do then I think you have probably misunderstood my meaning. But, yes, the state of the animal's health will affect how it responds.

Expand full comment

Okay. Sorry. I will keep trying to understand. I’ll read it until I do Lol

Expand full comment