I need to revisit my recent post on water fluoridation.
Last week saw an update on this issue on The Highwire and once again science was a missing link in this discussion. Why are regulatory bodies falling over backwards to prevent the publication of the National Toxicology Programme’s review on fluoride toxicity in humans. Who has the most to lose from an admission that chronic exposure to low levels of fluoride in drinking water leads to toxicity in humans and specifically neurotoxicity in infants and adolescents. Who has the power to infiltrate and influence all such regulatory bodies. The answer is simple and obvious. The global aluminium industry. Human exposure to aluminium is the proverbial ‘house of cards’ and an admission that low levels of fluoride are toxic in humans is sufficient to bring that house are cards tumbling down. Why? Because, low concentrations (less than 1ppm) of fluoride in drinking water are not per se toxic in humans. There is no known mechanism whereby this level of fluoride can be directly toxic in humans. Fluoride, along with other halides, chloride and iodide, was not absent during biochemical evolution. Natural selection has ensured that fluoride is non-essential (unlike chloride and iodide) and is only toxic, e.g. fluorosis, under rare circumstances of extremely high and acute exposure. This is not the case at the concentrations of fluoride present in fluoridated drinking water. However, fluoride binds aluminium in the acidic environment of the human stomach and prevents aluminium from forming insoluble hydroxides as it passes through the gut. This means that fluoride increases the absorption of aluminium across the human gut. A situation exacerbated when infant formulas are prepared from fluoridated drinking water, something I have covered in an earlier substack post.
I know that to many I sound more and more like a broken record. But my approach to science has always been to understand a problem by elucidating the mechanism. Chronic exposure to low levels of fluoride in drinking water cannot be responsible for for human toxicity and specifically neurotoxicity in the complete absence of aluminium. Add aluminium to the equation and you have your explanation of human toxicity, for example, significant deficits in infant and adolescent cognition and brain development.
"I know that to many I sound more and more like a broken record." - no no no - they are relentless and so must we be. I have seen the young ones through the years - the damaged ones have increased terribly. Simply we are in a "great poisoning" - One day we will all be controlled by vaccines administered at birth and throughout our (short) lives - Steiner saw this last century, It is their "dream".
In 2021, quietly in the midst of attendance at the covid circus.....municipal governments were beginning to add fluoride to all local water systems. Here in Massachusetts, where we have 511 towns/cities, prior to 2021 less than half (especially out here in the western part of the state) were poisoning their people. Now it's all across the board. This was the year that I first became aware of the 6-years suppressed report that had finally been released which found that there is NO SAFE LEVEL OF FLUORIDE IN DRINKING WATER. So funny that these things should occur simultaneously.
-In Christopher Bryson's The Fluoride Deception, he writes about how dialysis patients exposed to fluoride fare much poorer, and links the fluoride to accelerated kidney failure, among other things.
-None of this is surprising. The "government" has shown its desire to cause democide by its actions over the last three years....this desire has been there for a long, long time, but it didn't become obvious until now.