In the decade following HPV vaccine introduction, the rates of cervical cancer actually increased 50% in the UK - quite the opposite of expectation if the vaccine is targeting the virus that causes it.
In the decade following HPV vaccine introduction, the rates of cervical cancer actually increased 50% in the UK - quite the opposite of expectation if the vaccine is targeting the virus that causes it.
This paper won’t discuss by chance that whole population of HPV in us, the host, shifted to evade the vaccine and more variants came to foreground causing more cancer?
Imho adequate diagnostics and treatment and especially
- early treatment with
- transparent interventions (protected agains structural guess WHOm down as well as banal corruption)
- effective substances
- available,
- cheap,
- safe, also
- going multi-modal in modern intoxicated times, and doing
- individual dose finding (inc. allergy test) on any intervention
— is prime time to be delivered.
(If one of these 8 conditions is not met, a gangster is proposing it. :)
In the decade following HPV vaccine introduction, the rates of cervical cancer actually increased 50% in the UK - quite the opposite of expectation if the vaccine is targeting the virus that causes it.
More recent reports credit HPV vax with lowering cervical cancer by almost 90% - in all fairness. Curios about the apparent discrepancy...
This paper won’t discuss by chance that whole population of HPV in us, the host, shifted to evade the vaccine and more variants came to foreground causing more cancer?
Imho adequate diagnostics and treatment and especially
- early treatment with
- transparent interventions (protected agains structural guess WHOm down as well as banal corruption)
- effective substances
- available,
- cheap,
- safe, also
- going multi-modal in modern intoxicated times, and doing
- individual dose finding (inc. allergy test) on any intervention
— is prime time to be delivered.
(If one of these 8 conditions is not met, a gangster is proposing it. :)